
Numerous mappings or transformations can be applied to it. It confronts causal theories that x causes y with empirical evidence as to the actual relationship between x and y. Few people claim to fully understand the richness of even four-dimensional structures. This divide-and-conquer approach can reveal a plethora of patterns, but it is only the rare individual that can integrate a catalog of low-dimensional views into a coherent higher-dimensional framework. We can also condition on categorical variables. For complex multivariate structure, Furnas and Buja indicate how we can lower the viewing dimensionality by slicing or sectioning (adding linear constraints). Simple graphical methods do not work well except when there is a very simple geometric structure embedded in high-dimensional space. We are forced to use clustering algorithms and other computational methods to bring out patterns. Their eventual success suggests that using position along a scale to represent three variables has merit.Īs we move beyond four dimensions, our ability to judge interpoint distances deteriorates quickly. In a long sequence of efforts they failed to obtain insight using a wide variety of encodings. Their article includes color side-by-side stereo figures. They successfully used colored stereo ellipsoids to evaluate problems in improving an electrostatic potential model. Bayly and co-authors provide a notable exception. Our brains are not wired for the task of constructing higher-dimensional views from projections in lower dimensions.įew researchers have seriously tackled the visualization of six-dimensional data. Still it should be clear that the scatterplot matrix and the parallel coordinate plot do not help us to see in three dimensions as well as three-dimensional scatterplots do. The ability to observe smooth variation can easily be masked by noise in real data. The structure in the stereo ray glyph plot will immediately suggest the existence of a constraint and the fact the data are not four-dimensional. That is, select the triples ( u, v, w) randomly, say from a normal distribution, and then let x1 = f1( u, v, w), x2 = f2( u, v, x), x3 = f3( u, v, w), and x4 = f4( u, v, w) where the four functions are simple distinct polynomials. The smooth local variation of the ray angle strongly suggests that lower dimensional structure is embedded in four dimensions.Īs a demonstration of the inferior nature of nonpositional glyphs in low dimensions, one can generate, say a thousand points of three-dimensional data embedded in four dimensions. Some people can fuse the stereo pair images without a viewer. The ray pointing down to show small values and up to show large values.
